December 7, 2016

UTT Throwback Thursday: General Petraeus Wages Civilization Jihad

This week the Federalist published a scathing article about General Petraeus raising questions about his criminal actions by mishandling classified information, the possibility he is an agent of foreign powers – namely the Islamic governments of Saudi Arabia and UAE, as well as Kazakhstan – and that he favors silencing Americans’ right to free speech over offending Muslims.
petraeus2

The latter is where UTT will focus today’s Throwback Thursday article.

In an Op-Ed on May 13, 2016, General Petraeus spent a lot of time defending Muslims and their feelings, yet did not seem concerned about the liberties of Americans – specifically our right to free speech and expression without being beheaded, crucified or shot dead, as Muslims are prone to do.

Specifically, the General wrote:  “Those who flirt with hate speech against Muslims should realize they are playing directly into the hands of al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.”

Actually, if at some point since 9/11 General Petraeus had taken a few hours to study the enemy’s basis for all of their actions – sharia – and understood the driving force in the Global Movement – the International Muslim Brotherhood – has a strategy focused on getting our leaders to do the Muslim Brotherhood’s bidding for them, he might actually see that HE is one of those stooges doing the enemy’s bidding for them.

It’s called “Civilization Jihad by OUR hands.”

When the United States government wrote the Constitutions for Iraq and Afghanistan which created Islamic Republic’s under sharia thus giving Al Qaeda the objectives for which they were fighting, that was Civilization Jihad by OUR hands.  We did the enemy’s bidding for them.

When General Petraeus scolded a Pastor in America for burning a Koran (Sep 2010), that is Civilization Jihad by OUR hands – specifically, the General was enforcing the Islamic law of Slander by ensuring an American citizen would not take an action that would offend Muslims.

See the new 2 minute UTT video HERE on this very topic.

General Petraeus wrote in his May 2016 Op Ed:  “I fear that those who demonize and denigrate Islam make it more likely that it will be our own men and women who ultimately have to shoulder more of this fight.”

Actually sir, the commanding general not knowing his enemy is far more dangerous to the troops than those who speak truth about – and thereby offend – Muslims.

Know the threat. Understand the Threat.

abrogation, al-taqiyya, Armies of Mohammad, Civilization Jihad, counterinsurgency, Designated Terrorist, Espionage, information battlespace, Information Warfare, International Muslim Brotherhood, ISIL, ISIS, Islamic Law, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, Penetration Operations, Political Warfare, Saudi Arabia, sharia, Slander in Islam, State Sponsors of Terrorism, Terrorism, U.S. Military, US Muslim Brotherhood, UTT , , , , , , , , ,
About JG
John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).
One Comment
  1. OPINION:

    Generals David Petraeus and Benedict Arnold mirror similar dichotomies in that each courageously engaged in mortal combat on behalf of America, which they subsequently chose to betray on behalf of ideological differences and, ostensibly, personal gain, I.e. Islamic on the one hand, and Royalist on the other.

    Actually, “Boot Monument” in Saratoga National Park, New York was erected in 1887 to commemorate the foot wound General Arnold received fighting the British Redcoats at the Battle of Saratoga in the late 1700s; albeit, in view of his surreptitious & treasonous departure from the Continental Army at West Point, New York, his name by design isn’t etched on his monument.

    Whether or not the Congress, or some other entity e.g the Muslim Brotherhood, or Hamas, ever decide to have an anonymous memorial erected in “honor” of General Petraeus too (who imposed demonstrably suicidal rules of engagement on our Marines, Army infantrymen, Special Forces personnel and a variety of other American heroes under his contextually treasonous command to avoid the risk of offending sharia-adherent Muslims, I.e. the enemy, remains a matter of conjecture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *