Accurately detailing the Islamic infiltration of America’s political system requires a lengthy book. However, for this article UTT will detail how the political system has been penetrated, give a few examples, and then reveal the devastating consequences to America’s security when our political leaders fail to act when an obvious threat is staring them in the face.
The Islamic Counter-State in America is comprised of numerous entities and major components, including Iranian/Hizbollah/Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps forces, Deobandis, the Muslim Brotherhood, and others. Obviously, Al Qaeda and Islamic State operatives are inside the U.S. per testimony from a number of senior government officials.
The lead element here in the U.S. for the Islamic Counter-State is the Muslim Brotherhood.
For democrats the Muslim Brotherhood primarily plays the civil rights card to gain acceptance into their ranks.. For republicans the Muslim Brotherhood wraps itself in the flag, claims it is a pro-American movement and its members “moderate,” and proclaim it wants all the conservative ideas republicans claim they want for America.
The Muslim Brotherhood donates to both political parties via their organizations and leaders.
Through the Clinton, G.W. Bush, and Obama administrations, the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood made their way into positions of influence at the highest levels of government.
During the Clinton administration, the President’s Islamic Advisor – Abdurahman Alamoudi – turned out to be a senior Muslim Brotherhood leader and a financier for Al Qaeda who is now in federal prison.
On 9/11/01, when President George W. Bush was in office, the son of Mahboob Khan, one of the most prolific Muslim Brotherhood leaders in America – Suhail Khan – worked inside the Bush White House.
Currently, the Turkish Muslim Brotherhood is operating the equivalent of an embassy out of the Turkish Diyanet in Lanham, Maryland, taking over control of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood, and building an infrastructure on the East Coast of America, and no political leader seems to care. In fact, they conduct “outreach” with the Diyanet and encourage other local and state officials to do the same.
Why? Because U.S. leaders are convinced there are different “versions” of Islam and we – those in charge – just need to listen to the “moderate muslims.” How is listening to “moderate muslims” working out?
Are things better or worse than they were on 9/11/01 with regards to the domestic Islamic threat in the U.S.?
This disconnect from reality comes from a failure to analyze the Islamic threat professionally, understand the threat based on facts/evidence, and a failure – nearly 18 years after 9/11 – to identify the enemy in this war…or that we are even in a war at all.
For most American politicians, facts and evidence about the Islamic Counter-State and the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood organizations do not deter them from glad-handing jihadis on a regular basis and advancing the enemy’s cause.
Dozens of Members of Congress publicly support the designated Foreign Terrorist Organization Hamas doing business as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) by writing letters for them stating as much. See the letters HERE and an example below from Cory Booker.
Political leaders regularly attend functions at jihadi mosques and organizations, meeting with jihad leaders. U.S. law identifies “jihadi leaders” as “terrorists.”
During Senator Dick Durbin’s hearing on the “civil rights of muslims” he publicly thanked the Muslim Brotherhood’s Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) for preparing his staff for the hearing. This is the same ISNA which directly funds the terrorist group Hamas, per the in the largest terrorism financing trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history – US v Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, Northern District of Texas, 2008.
Saudi Arabia pours money into its programs to bring Members of the U.S. Congress to Saudi to “show” them how “moderate” and business savvy Saudi Arabia is.
Turkey pours money into its programs to bring State Legislators to Turkey to “show” them how “moderate” and “welcoming” Turkey is.
These propaganda operations work. Once the “friendships” are made, the door is open to further recruitment of political leaders by Muslim Brotherhood operatives.
For instance, by allowing Muslim Brotherhood leaders from the ADAMS Center, Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Hamas/CAIR, Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), Muslim Advocates, and other jihadi organizations, access to House/Senate Committees and staff, Cabinet Members, Presidents/Vice Presidents and their staffs, as well as others in the political realm, the propaganda gates remain open and the result is, as the former Director for Strategic Planning for the National Security Council stated, the total control of the U.S. national security decision-making process as it relates to Islamic issues.
What are the results of the Muslim Brotherhood advising senior U.S. political leaders about Islam, sharia, counter-terrorism, and related matters?
- The U.S. lost the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq despite the fact our military crushed the enemy on the battlefield.
- The U.S. State Department wrote the constitutions for Afghanistan and Iraq creating Islamic Republics ruled by sharia – thus giving Al Qaeda its stated objectives in those countries. The Muslim Brotherhood calls this Civilization Jihad by OUR hands.
- The U.S. government took sides against the four leaders on the earth who were in the greatest conflict with the Muslim Brotherhood. The U.S. political leaders killed Gaddafi (Libya) and Hussein (Iraq), pushed Mubarak (Egypt) out of power, and continues to pursue Assad (Syria).
These are but a small percentage of the victories for the Islamic Movement as a result of America’s political leaders being advised and led by U.S. Islamic leaders who can easily be identified as hostile actors operating against U.S. interests in furtherance of overthrowing the U.S. government.
With regards to the current conflict with Iran, many of the same Muslim Brotherhood leaders fill the halls of Congress and meet with national security staffers today to “advise” them on the best courses of action.
Not much has changed with regard to this Islamic threat and the politicians who are keeping them afloat.
The most important part of the strategy for U.S. victory remains the same. Americans must speak truth boldly about the Islamic Counter-State and the threat it poses to all free societies.
The sooner local/state/national republican leaders become more concerned with liberty, enforcing the law, and protecting America’s founding principles than they are with not being “divisive” or discussing anything “controversial,” the sooner victory will be within reach.