October 2, 2016

Finding Truth Among Talking Heads in the Media

by John D. Guandolo

talking-heads

Many of the questions UTT gets these days revolve around our thoughts on various talking heads who seems to “get it” about the Islamic threat.  Often times the questioners are disappointed to hear the truth UTT shares with them about the person whom they were inquiring.

It is important at this time in the war we all understand that any departure from the truth about the threat we are facing from the Global Islamic Movement provides space in which our enemies can operate.

Remember, our enemy is working most diligently and most effectively in the information battlespace.

Anyone giving our enemy room to maneuver is serving the enemy’s cause not America’s – no matter what their intentions.

What boxes the enemy in is the truth about who they are and what they are doing.

So today, the UTT team would like to offer three simple things to help our readers discern who among the talking heads are intentionally or unintentionally giving our enemies rooms to move, and those speakers who are on point:

  • How does the speaker refer to the threat?  Does he use terms like Islam, Jihad, Global Islamic Movement?  Or does he use terms intentionally meant to keep the discussion away from doctrinal Islam like violent extremists, radical terrorists, radical Muslims, or Islamism.
  • Does the speaker say such things as:  “The vast majority (or “99.9%”) of Muslims do not support what ISIS and Al Qaeda stand for,” “We must use moderate Muslims to drive a wedge between them and the extremist Muslims,” or other such nonsense?
  • Does the speaker claim he/she was “purged” from the government because of his stance on the threat of Islam?  There are three prominent speakers on the circuit today who claim this.  If someone was promoted and kept inside the government during the current administration at a time when those speaking real truth were pushed out, how can one claim he was purged?

UTT hopes these simple guidelines will help you discern truth-tellers from liars.

The Global Islamic Movement, including all of the jihadi organizations as well as jihadis killing people around the world from New York to London to Paris to Brussels to San Bernadino and Orlando, states they are muslims waging jihad in the cause of allah in order to establish a caliphate under sharia (Islamic law).

Its all about sharia.

Anyone watering the truth down at this point in the war is giving our enemy the ability to keep Americans from understanding the true nature of the threat while allowing the jihad to advance forward and making our victory that much more difficult.

al-taqiyya, Civilization Jihad, counterinsurgency, Counterintelligence, deception, Duality, Espionage, Florida, France, Germany, Hamas, Hezbollah, History of Islam, Homegrown Jihad, honor killing, hudud, Imam Feisal Rauf, information battlespace, Information Dominance, Information Warfare, Interfaith Outreach, International Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, Islamic Law, ISNA, jihad, John Guandolo, Law Enforcement, mohammad, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim Mafia, OIC, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, Orlando, Penetration Operations, Permissible Lying, Political Warfare, Propaganda, sharia, Sharia Index Project, Slander in Islam, Subversion, Terrorism, US Muslim Brotherhood, US Palestine Committee, USA v Holy Land Foundation, UTT , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
About JG
John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).
One Comment
  1. OPINION:

    The paradoxical issue at hand seems to combine a classic no-brainer with a (contextually) insurmountable catch-22.

    I.e., unless at the outset of each “talking head” interview, the question, “are you an adherent of Islamic Sharia”, is asked ON AIR, and answered sine qua non, with a “YES” or a “NO”, nothing of substance will follow that even remotely resembles the truth. Furthermore, and I’m not sure why, because the Navy never sent me there, but unless I sense that a particular “talking head” appears worthy of LEADING other men into mortal combat — I.e. who knows, possibly me — I wouldn’t take anything he says to the bank.

    Talking heads are either federally-embedded Muslim Brotherhood liars edging ever closer to the success of their century-old plan to destroy our country, and kill us; — or reimbursed self-styled geniuses amenable to a clear understanding that the Muslim Brotherhood’s definition of political correctness (I.e. anything detrimental to the psychopathy of their revered global jihadist killers) overshadows their right of return to the “green room” for subsequent “silver screen” appearances to impart to the American people more Harvard & Yale sourced solutions to winning a war while steadfastly refusing to name who we’re fighting.

    And, regrettably, any accurate assessment of how many Muslims worldwide are not sharia-adherent — which is the sole definition of moderation — probably remains thwarted by the understandable fear of those who may indeed be “moderate”, of being accused of apostasy and slaughtered for saying so. If deliverance from ignorance & said relevant fear, however, does exist, there is no better place on the face of the earth than the United States of America to achieve it. One might envision e.g. semi-annual gatherings of “moderate” Muslims convened to celebrate their personal receipt of documentary evidence from the Department of Justice confirming their repudiation of the 7th century draconian demands contained in Sura-9 of the Koran et al, thus of their official moderation, and of being effectively welcomed into the civilized world.

    One thing is certain (and if not true, will portend an existential disaster); i.e. if “99.9%” of Muslims are not, as asserted by the talking head geniuses from Harvard & Yale, actually moderate, should they ever therefore become 51% (or God forbid, more) of the U.S. population — bearing in mind, Pollyanna, that their birthrate TRIPLES every two decades — the United States as we now know it will cease to exist. And the only way to stop it from happening is with a preemptive return to square one. God Bless America, and God Bless UTT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *